Adverse media screening that surfaces signal, not noise.
Screen customers against negative news and surface the articles that actually indicate risk, each with a source citation, so reviewers spend time on relevant findings.
Open-web adverse media screening returns huge volumes of weakly related articles, and a single common name can pull in stories about other people entirely.
Without relevance filtering and entity resolution, reviewers wade through irrelevant results and still risk missing the article that matters.
BriteBase for adverse media screening
BriteBase filters adverse media for relevance, ties findings to the right entity, and presents each result with a citation, so the review is short and defensible.
A customer is screened against adverse media.
Results are filtered for relevance and risk.
Entity resolution ties findings to the correct party.
Relevant findings are presented with citations.
Reviewers act on a short, sourced list.
What powers the workflow
Relevance filtering
Cuts weakly related results.
Source citations
Every finding is citable.
Entity matching
Findings tied to the right person.
Defensible review
Short, sourced, audit-ready.
Frequently asked questions
What is adverse media screening?
Screening a customer against negative news to surface stories that indicate financial-crime or reputational risk. BriteBase filters results for relevance so reviewers act on signal, not noise.
How does BriteBase cut adverse media noise?
Open-web adverse media returns large volumes of weakly related articles, and common names pull in stories about other people. Relevance filtering and entity resolution tie findings to the right party and drop the noise.
Are adverse media findings sourced?
Yes. Every finding is presented with a source citation, so the review is short, sourced and audit-ready.
See adverse media screening in action with BriteBase.
See BriteBase screen a live customer against global sanctions, PEP and adverse media data. Book a demo with our team.