Screen merchants and payments at scale.

Yes. Merchants and payments are screened against sanctions, PEP and adverse media in real time, with agentic entity resolution keeping alert volumes workable as the network grows, which addresses a specific scaling problem payments providers face as their merchant network expands. Onboarding many merchants at once creates large screening and KYB workloads simultaneously, and without entity resolution, that workload grows roughly in proportion to merchant count, since each new merchant and its associated parties generates its own independent set of potential matches to review. Resolution keeps the workable-alert-volume relationship from scaling linearly with network size, since duplicate and near-duplicate matches across a growing merchant base are collapsed rather than each contributing its own separate review burden, meaning network growth does not translate directly into proportional growth in manual review effort.

Yes. KYB screening and beneficial ownership are captured as one structured record, rather than KYB being handled as a separate process disconnected from the payment screening a merchant also undergoes. This connection matters specifically for payments providers because merchant risk often lives with the people who actually own and control the business rather than the name of the business entity alone, and a payment platform that only screens the registered name of the merchant would miss exposure carried by an undisclosed or under-scrutinized beneficial owner, including exposure created by the 50% Rule several ownership layers up the chain. Structuring KYB and screening as one record means a payments provider is not reconciling two separate systems, one for ownership data and one for sanctions and adverse-media screening, but working from a single, connected view of merchant risk that covers both dimensions together.

Yes. Merchants are re-screened continuously as risk changes, rather than relying on a one-time check at onboarding that never gets revisited for the life of the merchant relationship. Merchant risk is not static: a merchant onboarded cleanly can later come under new ownership, accumulate adverse media, or trigger a sanctions match as lists update, and a payments provider relying solely on an onboarding-time check would have no mechanism for catching any of this after the fact. Continuous monitoring closes that gap using the same entity-resolution engine that keeps onboarding-time screening manageable, so a growing merchant network does not require a proportionally growing manual re-review process to maintain ongoing risk visibility across the whole book rather than just at the moment each merchant first joined.